Pod Hd500x Direct To Powered Speakers Or Pa

[bvaladez74]

Hey there...

 

A little background.  I'm incredibly familiar with the whole range of POD series.  Esp the HD series and the X3 series.  I've always been able to dial in really really amazing high gain, full round, huge sounding, real world...usable live tones.  I've been able to always configure my POD's for full blown big rock band original and cover band situations.  I've always used a POD with a tube power source, whether it's 4 cable method to a tube head, or using the amp sims and using a tube head as just power or more currently using my Matrix GT1000fx.  I'm really proficient with use of the different output settings, the different input settings, getting the most out of punchy loud, usable tones with the mixer, etc, etc.  

 

So w/out getting into the A, B, C's of the most basic common sense suggestions....is it possible that the HD's really, for the most part....short of over tweaking and having to go to extremes....that they sound like "lollipop" overall going direct into powered speakers or PA's?  I'm 95% speaking of high gain tones.  I've tried this for hours with my HD500, My HD Pro and now my 500x.  

 

Right out of the gate, and I know most of you who have tried this...know this....the higher gain tones or any subtle use of gain or drive....sound brittle, harsh, overly out of control.  The tones are cheap sounding and not meant for practical use in a pro situation.  Even after EQing the crap out of everything, even on direct output, even using stack out and dialing back the global highs and mids....on full amps and pre's...mixer in front and back of the amps, after relfashing a few times, after resetting....the high gain tones....running direct....just suck overall.  Does anyone have anything they've done to make these usable running direct?  I'm not talking your bedroom, blues, clean guitar....tele/strat guy.  Those tones are easy to achieve.  I'm talking any of the amp models that are higher gain...looking for that fluid, gain, pro level, big, round, brown...smooth overdrive.  

 

My rig is simple....my pod pedal board into a Matrix....and either a mesa 4x12 or two Orange 1x12's....with some analog pedals mixed in...and "yes"...I've done the physical troubleshooting w/out pedals or anything in the way.  I DO NOT think there's anything wrong at all with my 500x...I guess effortless amazing high gains tones running the pod into my Matrix or any amp.  Again, this has been the case of all POD's I've ever had, running into all kinds of PA's, or powered/active speakers.  

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thank you.

[gckelloch]

Assuming you know that to compare the sound you need to set the 1/4" output switch on the front to Line and the internal out to Studio Direct when going to a PA, you won't hear the full range sound coming out of your guitar cabs unless they are pointed directly at your head.  12" speakers don't disperse much above ~1kHz.  4x12" cabs are even more notorious for a "beaming" affect. 

 

What you miss in the Studio Direct sound is the added compression and subtle complex smoothing resonances of the real guitar speakers.  PA speakers (particularly the tweeters) have a much higher damping factor and better transient response to better convey everything going into them.  I don't think the Pod models include natural guitar speaker compression.  There should be a Drive Cab DEP knob if they did.  They also may not really capture the complex high end smoothing resonances, which can be somewhat comped by increasing the Cab DEP Res, Thump and/or Decay (damping factor). 

 

With a tube amp as you monitor amp, you also get some transformer, rectifier and/or PSU sag along with fattening tube compression, depending of how much you drive the amp.  The Vintage Mic Pre or Tube Compressor run after the amp models might cover that aspect, as well as keep the the cab resonances under control, evening out the level and sustain. You might like the tone more with the IN-Z set to 230k (essentially the same as turning the guitar tone knob down a bit), as there will be less preamp hash.

 

In order to really hear what is going into a mixing board from the Pod, you need to monitor with accurate full range studio monitors when you set up your presets.  You could also use quality full range headphones if you have a studio monitor simulation device.  There are some apps available for PC, but I've seen a headphone amp with such a feature.   Of course, make sure you aren't getting any internal Pod clipping or driving your PA into clipping.  

 

To hear what can be achieved direct to a mixer, listen to the sweet fat tones in this guy's video demo.

[bvaladez74]

gckelloch...

 

Ya I hear ya.  There are a couple things you can attempt, as you mentioned.  All have been attempted.  My switches are set to "line" already, being that I'm usually running line level into a power amp.  I'm aware of how tube amp compression works in terms of the different result in smoothed out tones.  In inZ setting doesn't really make a noticeable difference either.  I'm aware of all the technical results with those different aspects.  Greg D's tones on his vid's so far, are either direct into the clean channel of a tube amp, in the loop return of a tube amp or into an interface...to his computer.  I'm talking usable tones into a live PA or PA/active monitors-speakers....as I've heard people speak on it in terms of achieving usable tones...but most are not speaking in terms of high gain...most or all.

 

More background...I'm ONLY looking to achieve this as a back up scenario...if for some reason I were to lose signal on my power amps.  I'd obviously have a bank of patches configured for the back up scenario. 

 

I do have full range headphones....and I do start there...and it's similar harsh result...unless you really pull down most of highs...resulting in a smoother yet muffled tone.  I'll tweak some more, but really the reality is, achieving realistic high gain...full bodied tone isn't entirely possible unless you really cut things or add things EQ-wise in extreme ways....to get maybe half way there.  

 

I probably shouldn't have even posted this.  I'm pretty much highly proficient in these HD500 and X units enough.  I was just 2nd guessing myself.  "If" very high end full range active monitors make that much of a different, then that would be literally the only solution short of running your HD so extreme with EQ settings...still giving you a generally crap tone.  Maybe I'll just buy a 2nd Matrix power amp.  Ugh, another $800.  It's an amazing flat EQ'd powerful power amp.  Really brings out the best in the HD series.  My tube heads and power amps are sitting gathering dust right now cuz of the Matrix's tone.  

 

Anyway thanks.

[stumblinman]

For direct tones I put a graphic EQ at the end of my patches to fill in the weird frequency loss. It works well to fatten it back up when running in studio/direct mode. You're setting up your direct tones on the same PA at gig volume, right? I think it's humorous you say the bluesy sounds are easier to tweak. I found the chainsaw chugga chugga stuff way easier to set up. Maybe build new tones from scratch for PA.

 

Find a high gain amp you like, put EQ knobs at noon and flip through speaker cabs until you find one with the frequencies you want to accentuate. Then pick a mic that makes that cab/amp combo more articulate. Make sure your PA is set flat and your channel is too. Then begin to tweak your EQ on the pod until it's close to what you want. Add an EQ in the last effect block and tweak your overall tone there so you have a master EQ at the end depending on venue. Hope this helps! If not, maybe it will help someone else reading this topic.

[radatats]

Let me see if I understand what you are trying to do here.  As is stands now, you are able to get a good high gain tone using your current rig into the Mesa 4X12 or Orange 1X12 cabs?  You are now trying to get a similar high gain tone as a backup in case your Matrix fails and you have to rely on the PA/FOH or powered monitors?  Do I have that right?

 

It probably would help if you posted one of your "good" patches to CustomTone for us to work with before spending a lot of calories trying to do stuff you have already considered.  For instance, are you using pre or full models?  Are you fully using the DEP parameters? There will probably be a great deal of differences between a patch that works well with your amp and guitar cabs to one that works with a PA/Powered Speakers.

 

If you post one I, and others I am sure, would be glad to help where possible...

[gunpointmetal]

My experience is the same as OP....tried some cheap FRFR monitors (Harbinger), tried some expensive FRFR monitors (Mackie), tried some mid-range FRFR monitors (Behringer/Mackie), but for live volumes I couldn't get anything useable...the mid-range and low-end monitors had zero mid-range presence and couldn't even get over the drummer (all were tried in stereo with two 12" or 15" speakers) and they sounded like lollipop and balls at gig volumes. Yes I was setting up my patches at gig volumes, as well. I would need at least a stereo 31-band rack EQ to make them useable, but I can get recording tones easy, and I get compliments every time we play on my live tone which is Omen 8->HD500->Crate Powerblock-> 4x12 Grundorf Frankencab w/Bugera drivers. I can do awesome ethereal cleans and "just-broken-up" blues through the FRFR stuff no problem.

[bvaladez74]

gunpointmetal hit it right on the head.  

 

Like I said above...I tried full amps, pre's.  Yes there's a difference in comparison to one another, but not a difference in achieving anything usable.  Yes, you can add an EQ to the end of the block and...again...a difference...but ONLY in high gain modes or even AC/DC gain modes...the tones aren't realistic or anything usable.  The additional tweak settings beyond the amp modeal's EQ...like DEP and damp...etc....again....slight difference...but anything with higher gain...sounds plastic, harsh and brittle.  

 

PA channels were always flat, tones were always started from scratch.  

 

In response to stumblinman...not humorous with it being easier to achieve clean or bluesy tones...cuz if you notice, this thread is based ONLY around tones with more gain/distortion/drive.  Clean and a bit of break up...that's cake....in this set up.  That's where the lack of capability comes in direct to a PA.  That's where a guitar speaker and guitar amp or power amp smooth and flatten those frequencies out.  Now, "obviously".  

 

Thanks everyone for responding.  I was just looking for something or anything that maybe I haven't tried or heard of.  Shot in the dark.  The HD series is a great tool and works very very good in a pro live or gigging situation, used with a quality amp or power amp....into a guitar cab...with the ONLY exception of high end FRFR drivers.  Direct to PA in this set up requires too much of an extreme EQ "band aid" to use in comparison to a POD/amp set up.  That's a fact.  

 

All good...thanks guys.

[Akeron]

Try putting the EQs (you probably need two at least) on the blocks before the amp model. That seems to "work" with my Yamaha HS5 studio monitors...

[kevinlegault]

I was getting totally annoyed by my inability to get the tone I was hearing in my headphones out through my PA speakers. I had no volume or tone that was usable in a live situation. I then unplugged my XLR out on my board from the XLR in on my QSC K12 and swapped to the 1/4" outs and ins: bang...instant tone. I then ran out to two QSC K12s in stereo...sweet. i am using a Variax JTV-69, POD HD 500X, and two QSC K12s. Looking forward to next rehearsal and then giving it a shot live. Not sure if it will replace my Orange 212 rig because that is the cat's lollipop, but it will give me a viable back up.

[danskguitar]

I was getting totally annoyed by my inability to get the tone I was hearing in my headphones out through my PA speakers. I had no volume or tone that was usable in a live situation. I then unplugged my XLR out on my board from the XLR in on my QSC K12 and swapped to the 1/4" outs and ins: bang...instant tone. I then ran out to two QSC K12s in stereo...sweet. i am using a Variax JTV-69, POD HD 500X, and two QSC K12s. Looking forward to next rehearsal and then giving it a shot live. Not sure if it will replace my Orange 212 rig because that is the cat's lollipop, but it will give me a viable back up.

Kevin, I'm having the same problems with the QSC K12 and my POD HD500X. When I'm in a live situation - at times, even at rehearsals - I can't hear myself. Are you saying that by switching from XLR to 1/4'' you solved the volume problem? I'm gonna try this tonight. Hope it works, cause if not, I'll sell the active monitor and buy myself a amp or a good in-ear system. 

[dbagchee]

gunpointmetal hit it right on the head.  

 

Like I said above...I tried full amps, pre's.  Yes there's a difference in comparison to one another, but not a difference in achieving anything usable.  Yes, you can add an EQ to the end of the block and...again...a difference...but ONLY in high gain modes or even AC/DC gain modes...the tones aren't realistic or anything usable.  The additional tweak settings beyond the amp modeal's EQ...like DEP and damp...etc....again....slight difference...but anything with higher gain...sounds plastic, harsh and brittle.  

 

PA channels were always flat, tones were always started from scratch.  

 

In response to stumblinman...not humorous with it being easier to achieve clean or bluesy tones...cuz if you notice, this thread is based ONLY around tones with more gain/distortion/drive.  Clean and a bit of break up...that's cake....in this set up.  That's where the lack of capability comes in direct to a PA.  That's where a guitar speaker and guitar amp or power amp smooth and flatten those frequencies out.  Now, "obviously".  

 

Thanks everyone for responding.  I was just looking for something or anything that maybe I haven't tried or heard of.  Shot in the dark.  The HD series is a great tool and works very very good in a pro live or gigging situation, used with a quality amp or power amp....into a guitar cab...with the ONLY exception of high end FRFR drivers.  Direct to PA in this set up requires too much of an extreme EQ "band aid" to use in comparison to a POD/amp set up.  That's a fact.  

 

All good...thanks guys.

I've had the same experience. Running direct just doesn't have the same punch that running through a real guitar cab does. What band are you in? I'm just over the hill and would love to hear that Matrix live!

[kevinlegault]

Kevin, I'm having the same problems with the QSC K12 and my POD HD500X. When I'm in a live situation - at times, even at rehearsals - I can't hear myself. Are you saying that by switching from XLR to 1/4'' you solved the volume problem? I'm gonna try this tonight. Hope it works, cause if not, I'll sell the active monitor and buy myself a amp or a good in-ear system. 

Let me know how it worked for you.  I was using XLR cables because I thought that would be the best direct low noise alternative, but they killed tone and volume.  1/4 to 1/4 from POD to Active Monitor worked for me...

[danskguitar]

Let me know how it worked for you.  I was using XLR cables because I thought that would be the best direct low noise alternative, but they killed tone and volume.  1/4 to 1/4 from POD to Active Monitor worked for me...

Alright. I'll have a rehearsal this weekend. After that, as soon as possible, I'll come back here and tell you if it worked.

[videoman77]

Im looking forward to hear this scenario play out.  I go XLR out to our Church PA and thru the board we we have Aviom monitor systems with in-ears.  I notice that what i hear in the in-ears is dramatically different than what the sound man is hearing.  I can't see him actually trying to re-eq all my sounds, but it sounds that way. So I'm wondering if i switch over to 1/4 out if i can get back those original sounds?

 

If this in theory was the issue, why?  Why would an unbalanced connector sound better than a balanced connector?

[radatats]

Im looking forward to hear this scenario play out.  I go XLR out to our Church PA and thru the board we we have Aviom monitor systems with in-ears.  I notice that what i hear in the in-ears is dramatically different than what the sound man is hearing.  I can't see him actually trying to re-eq all my sounds, but it sounds that way. So I'm wondering if i switch over to 1/4 out if i can get back those original sounds?

 

If this in theory was the issue, why?  Why would an unbalanced connector sound better than a balanced connector?

there is no difference in tone between XLR and 1/4 outs, just signal strength.  1/4 are line level and XLR are mic level, much quieter.  Don't know why there should be a huge difference between the in ears and the house.  Of course the speakers may color the tone somewhat but it shouldn't be too drastic.  Check with the sound guy and see what he is doing...

[bvaladez74]

I've had the same experience. Running direct just doesn't have the same punch that running through a real guitar cab does. What band are you in? I'm just over the hill and would love to hear that Matrix live!

I'm in a couple cover bands.  Auto Replay (based in Sacramento) and Guilty Pleasure (based in the south bay).  Just party cover bands....rock, pop, some dance stuff...all of the above.  My next local gig isn't til August 15th...cuz my more local cover band...we need a few weeks to work in a new drummer...so I had to put us on break for 2 months.  Aug 15th @ Maggie McGarry's in SF, then Aug 23rd @ Troy's Bocce Room in Morgan Hill and so on.  The Sacramento band dates are: June 28th @ Swabbies in Sac, July 12th @ Halftime in Rocklin, July 25/26 @ Cabo Wabo in Tahoe and so on.  

 

I love the matrix.  I come from the large rig, tube head...4x12 cab school.  Lately it's just been two 1x12 orange cabs, matrix, pod hd 500x  and a few pedals...and it sounds just as big and tube like as my traditional rigs....but with more definition.  

[jandrio]

check out demo  vid from our last gig.

JTV+HD500 direct 2 PA , no amp .

 

http://line6.com/support/topic/7743-post-videos-of-live-performances-with-variaxes/?do=findComment&comment=56231

 

more vids with patches available @ :

https://www.youtube.com/user/pureages/videos

[dbagchee]

I'm in a couple cover bands.  Auto Replay (based in Sacramento) and Guilty Pleasure (based in the south bay).  Just party cover bands....rock, pop, some dance stuff...all of the above.  My next local gig isn't til August 15th...cuz my more local cover band...we need a few weeks to work in a new drummer...so I had to put us on break for 2 months.  Aug 15th @ Maggie McGarry's in SF, then Aug 23rd @ Troy's Bocce Room in Morgan Hill and so on.  The Sacramento band dates are: June 28th @ Swabbies in Sac, July 12th @ Halftime in Rocklin, July 25/26 @ Cabo Wabo in Tahoe and so on.  

 

I love the matrix.  I come from the large rig, tube head...4x12 cab school.  Lately it's just been two 1x12 orange cabs, matrix, pod hd 500x  and a few pedals...and it sounds just as big and tube like as my traditional rigs....but with more definition.  

 

Cool - I added Guilty Pleasure on Facebook so I could keep track of dates.

[JTSC777]

Great thread very interesting. I use these modelling devices (Roland GR55/Boss GT10/Line 6 HD 500 etc...) a lot through either 2 Alto powered 10 in or 12 in FRFR speakers or even sometimes an Atomic Reactor wedge (the one with 6l6s in it).They all sound good and do the job but depending on what I am doing and who I am working with I will also use various tube amps/cabs/pedals and  or an M13. IMHO the OP will get better results not using the HD500 for most of his gigs.The "realsim" of the tones he is seeking from an HD500/FRFR rig may not ever sound right to his ears as he is very used to tube power sections/guitar cabs. I don't ever get used to anything because I am always changing it up for the situation. My next large show is with an original band (Follys Pool) and I am using either my Boss GT10 or HD500 direct to the board with in-ears and one Alto 10 FRFR just for some reactance between the guitar and speaker. I am doing this because the main vocalist is a very quiet singer who has hearing problems.The following week i will be with a 6 piece female fronted rock band that has a lead vocalist that sings loud as hell. For that it will be a Fender HRDLX/cab or JCM800 combo/cab pedals.I no longer try to get these modellers to do everything in  every situation. I use them when they work and when they don't I use something else.

 

Good Luck and Have Fun!

[longhorns12]

I see you are having trouble with harshness and your highs... What I recommend is to adjust the sag, Bias, and Bias excursion.  The Bias and Bias excursion will help you hear the higher notes more or less depending on what you want and the sag will give it a more low end, crunchy sound to it.  I use the HD500x live through a PA system and once I got my patches sounding good it all worked out fine.  Also try adjusting the EQ on the PA system I like to just turn that off and just use my HD500x's EQ.  And turn down the gain on the PA system and if it has it add a noise gate effect to your channel.  ALSO if you want more punch and stuff to act more like a Cab then adjust the cab settings/mic setting and it will make a HUGE difference.  :)

[maxnew40]

I am using the HD500 and the Line 6 L2m speaker. I don't play high gain or metal, but I found getting the 70's AC/DC tone to be very easy. In fact I have found while learning some new tunes for the band, that while playing along I can get an almost identical tone to the recording for most everything our band does from the 60s and 70's.

 

I went from using the HD500 into a tube power amp and speaker cab, but have found that it probably sounds twice as good using the full amp models through the L2m.

 

 

-Max

[k-town]

Have you messed with the sag, hum, bias, and bias excursion settings? Have you played with the cab simulators?

 

I'm not sure if you're bypassing your amps preamp, or running direct into the board?

[k-town]

Hey there...

 

A little background. I'm incredibly familiar with the whole range of POD series. Esp the HD series and the X3 series. I've always been able to dial in really really amazing high gain, full round, huge sounding, real world...usable live tones. I've been able to always configure my POD's for full blown big rock band original and cover band situations. I've always used a POD with a tube power source, whether it's 4 cable method to a tube head, or using the amp sims and using a tube head as just power or more currently using my Matrix GT1000fx. I'm really proficient with use of the different output settings, the different input settings, getting the most out of punchy loud, usable tones with the mixer, etc, etc.

 

So w/out getting into the A, B, C's of the most basic common sense suggestions....is it possible that the HD's really, for the most part....short of over tweaking and having to go to extremes....that they sound like "lollipop" overall going direct into powered speakers or PA's? I'm 95% speaking of high gain tones. I've tried this for hours with my HD500, My HD Pro and now my 500x.

 

Right out of the gate, and I know most of you who have tried this...know this....the higher gain tones or any subtle use of gain or drive....sound brittle, harsh, overly out of control. The tones are cheap sounding and not meant for practical use in a pro situation. Even after EQing the crap out of everything, even on direct output, even using stack out and dialing back the global highs and mids....on full amps and pre's...mixer in front and back of the amps, after relfashing a few times, after resetting....the high gain tones....running direct....just suck overall. Does anyone have anything they've done to make these usable running direct? I'm not talking your bedroom, blues, clean guitar....tele/strat guy. Those tones are easy to achieve. I'm talking any of the amp models that are higher gain...looking for that fluid, gain, pro level, big, round, brown...smooth overdrive.

 

My rig is simple....my pod pedal board into a Matrix....and either a mesa 4x12 or two Orange 1x12's....with some analog pedals mixed in...and "yes"...I've done the physical troubleshooting w/out pedals or anything in the way. I DO NOT think there's anything wrong at all with my 500x...I guess effortless amazing high gains tones running the pod into my Matrix or any amp. Again, this has been the case of all POD's I've ever had, running into all kinds of PA's, or powered/active speakers.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thank you.

[k-town]

1) sag, bias, bias x

 

2) if your using a real tube power amp consider using the pods pre amp models...

 

3) powered speakers...I'd use a combo model, mess with the sag, bias and bias x. Studio/direct output

Assuming youre also running a signal direct to the house mixer

[bvaladez74]

@ k-town. Thanks for the response.  The sag and bias settings don't really address what this thread was about over a year ago.  We're all good.  Certain pieces of gear are better than others for certain scenarios.  All good.  Thanks.

[strayfalcon]

Hi ,

 

Noobie question , I just bought an HD 500 x and real excited about getting this operational , my question is this I would like to run my 500 direct into a powered monitor then a line out to the PA , how do I do this can anyone put up an image / Diagram , I've got a mackie powered monitor that I wanna use , genre - covers , I'm new to this so my apologies for the asking what is probably a real basic question to all you experienced users , I plan on using it for live applications only and only want to use a powered monitor then into a desk . Thank you

[silverhead]

Set the Output mode of your HD500X to Studio/Direct. Use full (not pre) amp models in your HD500X presets.

 

You speak of using "a" powered monitor so I will assume you require a mono, not stereo, output in a single cable. For this you should use the L 1/4" output from the HD500X to your powered monitor. Set the 1/4" Output switch on the top panel of the Hd500X to Line.

[pianoguyy]

Hi ,

 

Noobie question , I just bought an HD 500 x and real excited about getting this operational , my question is this I would like to run my 500 direct into a powered monitor then a line out to the PA , how do I do this can anyone put up an image / Diagram , I've got a mackie powered monitor that I wanna use , genre - covers , I'm new to this so my apologies for the asking what is probably a real basic question to all you experienced users , I plan on using it for live applications only and only want to use a powered monitor then into a desk . Thank you

 

Just plug it in that way. There's no diagram needed. 

The one issue you may run into is if you are running stereo sounds, because you didn't exactly state if you were going to be running into a stereo or mono system. Even that isn't an issue. You just may not hear everything. 

[strayfalcon]

Hey everyone thank you so much for the replies and help, apologies too - yes running mono only 1 single powered monitor , no stereo sounds/effects just mono , once again thank you for ya help

[DunedinDragon]

Just run the 1/4" output into your monitor as described by UberGuru and run one of the XLR outs from the POD to the desk.  You won't need to run both XLR outs to the desk if you're not using stereo effects.  With a good PA system your front of house sound should match up nicely to your stage monitor sound.

[FabulusFab]

Hi Guys...

 

Very interesting topic that I just found...

 

I experienced the same thing... and I'm pretty used with amps and PODs...

 

A couple of years ago, I used to play with  a Hughes and Kettner preamp proccessed in a Digitech GSP 2101 sent in a Crown amp DC-300, driving 2 Fane cabs (in stereo). I had a great guitar sound ...

(I still have all that gear...)

 

For a transport reason, I would say.... I bought  a POD Pro (back in around 2002), expecting to have everything in one box... That idea was to eventually plug directly in the board and get my guitar sound in my monitor mix... So, I would only have to carry my Pod and my guitar...

 

Already, I experienced the same problems that you describe..

 

Then I bought the HD500 couple of years later that I worked on for the past three years trying, as you described, to get THE TONE... I drive the HD500 in Krk V8 studio monitors... and I tried everything, from trying the main setup in Studio/Direct mode, to Combo, Stack, etc. using one amp, two amps in parallel, EQs, I even tried with the POD through the FX Loop in order to get more DSP to use another EQ, etc, etc.

 

This device is so versatile that I can't believe that I can't achieve to get a proper Hi-gain tone... To my eyes, this HD500 box is like having a complete music shop were you could try to mix everything, from amps to cabs to mics...

 

So, there should be a way to make it sound really good...

 

Usually, I try to boost lo-mids around 160-200 Hz, cut around 1kHz and 2,5kHz but I still have some zzzzzzzz in the tone...

 

Clean sounds are not so bad, though...

 

Really interesting to read your posts, 

 

By the way, I've been really interested reading the posts from Iknowathingortwo ... I feel that we've been through the same hard quest...

[DunedinDragon]

Just so you understand iknowathingortwo isn't the member's name, that's the member's status based on number of posts.

 

A lot of the sound you're going to get is really based on the output.  You're right in that with all the adjustments, amps, cabinets, and mic's as well as the adjustments and tweaks available, there' no reason you shouldn't be able to get the sound you want.....given you've got a speaker that's able to provide an adequate response.

 

You're going to find that some users simply can't be happy with FRFR systems, and can only achieve the sound they want with an amp and cabinet.  Over time I've developed a theory about this.  I've been playing in live bands for over 50 years, and in that time I've used a pretty wide range of traditional equipment.  Last year I decided to go the route of the HD500X and an FRFR system which was a complete change from traditional amps.

 

What I loved most about the FRFR setup was the clarity and articulation of the sound...even heavily overdriven sounds.  That clarity and articulation is really due solely to the difference between a FRFR setup and an amp/cabinet setup.  I actually had to adjust my ears (and my technique) to this new sound.  Traditional amp/cabinet setups don't really provide much in terms of separation of individual tones and frequencies like a FRFR speaker does.  Everything pretty much blends together.  I've adjusted what I expect to hear to this more precise and articulated sound.  You can still mush things up playing with settings like BIAS and ResLevels on the cabinets, but now I actually prefer the newer sound because I can do more with it as far as technique and blending in a live setting.  Many of the things I would do on traditional amps would get buried in the stage mix with the other instruments, but on the FRFR system can clearly be heard in the mix.  I've also had to adjust my technique to be more precise for exactly the same reason...but I think of that as a good thing.

 

In a way I think of this new sound as more like a studio recorded sound rather than a live sound because that's more what it's like and allows the whole band to sound closer to a studio mixed sound than a traditional live sound.  Personally I like that...but your mileage may vary.

[victorbicudo]

@ k-town. Thanks for the response.  The sag and bias settings don't really address what this thread was about over a year ago.  We're all good.  Certain pieces of gear are better than others for certain scenarios.  All good.  Thanks.

 

I know you're over this issue, but i got curious how nobody asked you how you were setting your patches to go into a power amp + 412 cab. were you using "no cab" in your tone? Or were you using another output setting other than "studio/direct" (wich is supposed to kinda turn off cabinet emulation, although we all know they do their own thing). And how is your tone going to the audience? Are you using a microphone to the house PA? This piece of information is vital, you may have your tone reference messed up a little. If i go to a power amp+cab i always turn off my cab sim. At first the tone may sound a little harsh, but going through non-FRFR cabs with cab sim turned on is NOT the way to go IMO. I use the J800 pre w/ a tubescreamer in front and really like the results going through a FRFR powered monitor onstage. If what you're saying would be right, than the HD500 would be not be usable for going straight into the PA (that mostly consists in powered speakers). See, i'm not saying you don't know your way around the unit, i guess maybe your sonic reference could be different.

[exir007]

witch one is better?

VOX AC30C2 combo 1100$

or

Yamaha HS7 studio monitor for hd500x?